Commercial decision engines
Analysis is not a decision.
Everyone has AI now. Almost nobody has it where the money is decided.
It drafts the email, summarises the deck, cleans the data, writes the code. That is breadth, and breadth buys no advantage — your competitors bought the same tools in the same quarter at the same price. Depth is the lever, and depth means the handful of decisions each year that actually move the P&L.
and whether you can hold it when a competitor moves
and whether the rationale survives an audit
and whether winning it was worth it
enter or exit, build or buy, expand or hold — and how much to commit now
Why not just ask an AI
Six months from now someone asks why you committed the money. You have the alternatives you considered, the numbers you used, the assumptions you made and who approved them — not a chat you cannot reproduce.
Ask an LLM the same question two ways and the recommendation can move. Two people on your team, same facts, two answers, and the winner is whoever wrote the better prompt. Here the argument is about the assumptions — which is the argument worth having.
You get the decision and what it turns on: which assumption would have to be wrong to change the answer, and by how much. That tells you what to go and find out, and what to stop researching.
The reasoning stays with your organisation, not with the analyst or the consultant who leaves. The next decision of the same shape starts from something.
Where the AI stops
The AI does a great deal of the work. It reads, researches, interrogates and argues. It is never the thing that sets a number.
01 · The AI
Reads your documentsTenders, RFPs, vendor submissions, cost files. It pulls them into structured inputs instead of you retyping them.
02 · The AI
Finds the evidenceLive market and counterparty research, run inside the bench. Every finding arrives with a source you can open and check.
03 · You
Confirm every inputNothing computes until each assumption is in front of you. A model that quietly supplied its own numbers would make the arithmetic reproducible and the answer not.
04 · The engine
Does the arithmeticSame inputs, same answer, every time. Two people with the same facts get the same recommendation — not whoever wrote the better prompt. No AI touches a number here.
05 · The AI
Attacks the resultIt red-teams the case, runs consistency checks against it, and will play your counterparty across a full negotiation before you meet the real one.
06 · Beyond it
Escalates, never guessesWhere a decision falls outside what the engine can resolve, it says so. The override is yours, recorded with its grounds. The objective it maximises is set by you.
Then it tells you how far each assumption can move before the recommendation changes.
That is the number the decision actually turns on — what to go and verify next week, and what to stop researching.
See the spine of this run in about five minutes — try one below ↓
Four engines
01 · The price you set
What to charge, when to move and how to defend it. Three sub-decisions: pricing an enhancement you have just built, adjusting a price under cost pressure, and entering a new market.
You leave with a price, the revenue and volume consequences, and the competitor response it assumes. Two of the three are runnable now ↓
02 · The supplier you award
Which supplier, at what total cost, under what conditions — with criteria scored before any supplier was evaluated.
You leave with an award decision your CPO can sign and your auditor can follow.
03 · The bid you price
Whether to pursue, at what price, and when walking away beats winning — win probability quantified before the conversation starts.
You leave with a floor, a target and a concession plan.
04 · The strategy you choose
Entering or leaving a market, acquiring versus building versus partnering, restructuring a supply chain, expanding capacity, divesting a line, licensing rather than commercialising, funding a transformation in tranches — commitments made in stages, with evidence arriving between them.
You leave with the path to commit to, what each gate must establish, and the point at which that choice reverses.
Run one yourself
These two are demonstrations. They run a single decision on a fixed set of questions so you can see how the method behaves — the engine computing, the AI writing around numbers it cannot change. The engines themselves take your own data, your own segments and your own competitive picture, and carry considerably more than what runs here.
Pricing · product enhancement
Whether it gets charged for, folded into a tier, or used to defend your price — and whether that price should be flat or metered once a few accounts drive most of the usage.
Twelve plain questions. You get the call, what would have to change to reverse it, and a written brief.
Run the enhancement tester ↗
Pricing · price adjustment
How much the market will absorb, what it costs you in volume if you move and in margin if you don't, and the single number at which the answer changes.
Same shape, same five minutes. Built for a cost increase from any source — tariffs, inputs, freight or labour.
Run the price tester ↗
Market entry is the third pricing decision. It runs inside an engagement and is not yet open to the public.
Where the method comes from
Founder and principal · Toronto
Twenty-five years of B2B pricing and procurement work, before any of it was software. Engagements are led personally and staffed with partner firms where the work calls for it.
How it starts
Bring a live one — a price move, an award, a bid, a staged commitment. We run it together and you see the output before anything else is discussed.